top of page
2025-05-16 App_14117_2025
Source:
-
Art. 58 UPCA - Protection of confidential information
Rule 262 – Public access to the register, Rule 262A – Protection of Confidential Information
-
The following text is not a complete transcript of the decision/order:
Düsseldorf Local Division
UPC_CFI_203/2025
Preliminary Procedural Order
of the Court of First Instance
issued on 16 May 2025
concerning EP 1 957 544 B1
APPLICANT:
DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US, LLC., legally represented by its directors, 974 Centre Road, Bldg 730, Wilmington, DE, 19805, United States
Represented by: Attorney-at-law Dr Andreas von Falck, Attorney-at-law Lea Gröblinghoff, Attorney-at-law Diana Rodriguez, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Dreischeibenhaus 1, 40474 Düssel-dorf, Germany
Electronic address for service: upc-hub@hoganlovells.com
contributing: Attorney-at-law and Patent Assessor Dr Martin Fähndrich, Attorney-at-law and European Patent Attorney Dr Tobias Timmerscheidt, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Dreischei-benhaus 1, 40474 Düsseldorf, Germany
DEFENDANT:
Greenchemicals S.R.L., legally represented by its directors, Via Lavoratori Autobianchi, 1 20832 Desio (MB), Italy
EUROPEAN PATENT NO. 1 957 544 B1
PANEL/DIVISION: Panel of the Local Division in Düsseldorf
DECIDING JUDGES:
This order was issued by Judge Dr Thom acting as judge-rapporteur.
LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS: English
SUBJECT: R. 262A RoP – Protection of confidential information
GROUNDS OF THIS ORDER:
The confidentiality order shall be issued.
The reasons given by the Defendants as to why the imposed penalty in case of a culpable breach
should be dropped are not convincing. If the information is known, the exception under section III
applies. However, the Defendants have not demonstrated that the information in question was
publicly available, even if the products had been purchased from a licensee of the Applicant. The
Applicant argued that its licensees do not communicate the agreed prices to their customers and
the Defendant failed to demonstrate that this was not the case here. Therefore, the order set out
below is justified.
ORDER:
I. The financial information contained in paragraph 73 of Applicant´s comments
submitted on 21 March 2025 highlighted in grey and in Exhibit HL 15 highlighted in
yellow is classified as confidential within the meaning of Art. 58 UPCA in conjunction
with R. 262.2 RoP.
II. Access to the information classified as confidential in Section I shall be limited on the
part of the Defendant to the following person:
Defendant´s representatives to be appointed in the present proceedings
Mrs
employee in the administrative department of the Defendant.
III. The information identified by the Applicant as confidential in Section I shall be treated
as such by the Claimant´s representatives and their teams and by the natural person
named in Section II. until further notice and shall not be used or disclosed outside of
these court proceedings, except to the extent that it has come to the knowledge of the
receiving party outside of these proceedings, provided that the receiving party has
obtained it on a non-confidential basis from a source other than the Applicant or its
affiliates, provided that such source is not bound by a confidentiality agreement or
other obligation of secrecy with the Applicant or its affiliates.
III. In the event of a culpable breach of this order, the Court may impose a penalty
payment for each breach, to be determined having regard to the circumstances of each
case.
IV. If the Defendants representatives make use of their possibility to grant access to
confidential information to other members of their team, they are responsible for
ensuring that their team maintains the confidentiality of the information. In the event
of culpable breach of the confidentiality obligations the Defendant´s representatives
would therefore be liable. This also applies to any breach of the duty of confidentiality
by any member of their team to whom they have granted access.
V. The obligation to maintain secrecy shall continue to apply after the present
proceedings have been concluded.
VI. As the Applicant also requested that the information be kept confidential to any third party, this R.262.2-Request must be made in the correct CMS workflow.
DETAILS OF THE ORDER:
App_14117/2025 under the main file reference ACT_11006/2025
UPC number: UPC_CFI_203/2025
Type of procedure: Application for provisional measures
Issued in Düsseldorf on 16 May 2025
bottom of page